Hi everyone!
Here's our final service learning project.
Love, Brandy Alex Cathy and Kaleena :)
Tuesday, April 29, 2014
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
Social Justice Event... WOOP WOOP
Social Justice Event: Vagina Monologues Open Books, Open Minds
Okay, so I went to The Vagina Monologues. I went on
Valentine’s Day. I have yet to post a blog, I was going to do it today (April
10th, 2014). After my math class though, I went to the “Open Books,Open Minds” conference or meeting for my seminar class. We were presenting my
poster. I’m using this event instead since it related so much more to this
class! ****I STARTED WRITING THIS THE 10th THAT'S WHY IT SAYS THAT :)
Okay, before I start this… Remember before we entered
college, we were supposed to read that "Pym" book? I wasn’t too upset about it, I
love reading. Except for this book… I couldn’t get past the 5th
page. But on the bright side, it’s a nice decoration on my book shelf. Anyways!
There were six students in the front of the room talking about all of the
different themes within this book. Kaleena and I kept staring at each other
because it was so relative to this class!
One of the students was talking about racism. He also
related the author, or the protagonist in the book, to Rosa Parks and Martin
Luther King. He was saying that they faced many difficulties in their lives and
couldn’t be heard. This reminded me of Rodriguez, Collier, and Delpit. All
three of these authors had a general theme that there
are many cultures within
a classroom. In addition, it reminded me of our SWAAMP activity (Straightness,
Whiteness, Americanness, Able-bodiedness, Maleness, and Property). We already
have these preconceived ideas in life and our lives are constantly being
influenced by these dominant ideologies. Within the story Pym, with the main
protagonist (Pym himself) being black, he was already struggling. People were
already giving him a hard time and no one would listen to him just because of
his skin color.
They were also talking about how there was actually violence
within this book. There was a tension between Pym’s ship, when he was on sea, and
the Native American’s. People were being killed, yet miraculously Pym and his
partner, Peters, didn’t die. They end up becoming friends with one of the
Natives who ends up admitting that he has a fear of anything that’s white, which is another sign of racism. Or maybe he’s
scared because he thinks that they’re racist towards him. This reminded me of,
in a way, to Johnson. He openly admitted that he was afraid of someone from a
different race and he was talking explicitly about his issue. He knew that
white people had more power than him and he was actually afraid of that
concept. I also think this is an anti-August situation since this person didn’t
feel safe. He wasn’t comfortable in his surroundings, or society.
Another student was talking about a homosexual couple. She
was saying how differently they were being treated on this adventure. This
reminded me of August because we talked about homosexuality in that article. It’s
not necessarily that this homosexual couple didn’t feel safe, but it was more
of the fact that they didn’t feel comfortable and were not accepted. August
says that you need to feel connected and included, which clearly these characters
didn’t feel since they were being treated differently from the rest. Just
because they weren't a straight couple, it led to them feeling left out.
Overall, it was a good event for this class. It was kind of
funny since I went to an event, the Vagina Monologues, and paid money for it to
use as my blog post but instead a chose a completely opposite event. I only was
at this event for another class but it was crazy how relative you could make it
to this class! I didn’t like the Vagina Monologues that much… I mean, it was funny but for future FNED students – I wouldn’t
go to it :)
HERE'S A PICTURE OF ME WITH A SUPER COOL PIN FROM THIS EVENT
And I doubt you want this, but here's a link to buy "Pym" on amazon in case you want to buy it!
Sunday, April 20, 2014
Shor thing, chicken wannnng... TYING EVERYTHING UP.
HAPPY EASTER EVERYONE!!! Who needs to go out when you can do
homework? (Haha, kidding, sort of…) Anyways, here’s another connections post
because… why not?
When I was reading Shor’s article, I was so unbelievably
bored! I don’t know why but I was. But then I was thinking, maybe because he
covers so many topics at once that I wasn’t really into the text. And maybe
because many of the things that he covered was related to the other articles
that we read.
On page 20, Shor said that “many withdraw from intellectual
work because they are told so much and asked to think and do so little. Rote
drills drain their enthusiasm for intellectual life, as do short-answer exams and
standardized tests”. This reminded me of that activity we did with Dr. Bogad
when we had that “pop quiz”… It was the week we had Jeannie Oake’s article. When
you go to school and do that, you’re not really learning anything… You’re
memorizing things just to pass but you’re not learning any helpful information.
On the next page, another quote backed up Oake’s theory even more. It said, “Large
numbers of students are refusing to perform at high levels, demoralizing the
teachers who work with them. At times, performance strikes become organized
resistance to authority, with leadership and articulate demands. But most often
the students’ refusal to perform appears as low motivation, low test scores and
achievement, and a “discipline problem”. […] The low performance of students is
routinely misjudged as low achievement”. This reminded me of the whole tracking
process and how some students had been put in the higher classes while others
were put in the lower ones. It kind of shows how kids refuse to do tracking in
schools. Then, when Dr. Bogad was explaining to us how ashamed she was that we
all just took this “stupid test” and didn’t refuse to take it even though they
were just basic questions, this quote came into play: “From the start, I wanted
students to be active and thoughtful. A participatory class begins with participation.
A critical and empowering class begins by examining its subject matter from the
students' point of view and by helping students see themselves acknowledgeable
people. I wanted them to take, from day one, a critical attitude toward their knowledge,
their writing habits, and their education. The foundation of the syllabus would
be their words, understandings, self-respect, and desire to learn more. I hoped
they would recognize that they were already writers who knew some important
things about writing, even before the teacher told them anything” (37). It
showed me that we aren’t dumb, we’re all very smart even though we may not see
it right away. We should never look at ourselves as anything less.
Then, my little buddy Kohn came into play with the ideal classroom. “The typical classroom
is framed by the competition, marked by struggle between students (and often
between teacher and students), and riddled by indicators of comparative
achievement and worth. Star charts on the wall announce who has been successful
at learning multiplication tables, only children with “neat” handwriting have
their papers posted for display” (23-24) reminded me of Kohn because it
reminded me of the “bad signs” of a classroom. It even mentioned two of them from
the chart itself, with only the “good” projects being shown to others and the
star chart. It’s a shame that this is considered a typical classroom.
Especially since we’ve learned all of the “good signs” a classroom should have,
this once again shows you how negative of an affect it can have on your
classroom.
When I came across the quote, “From a critical point of
view, existing canons of knowledge and usage are not a common culture; they
have ignored the multicultural themes, idioms, and achievements of nonelite
groups, such as women, minorities, homosexuals, and working people. The empowering
teacher who denies universal status to the dominant culture also denies
emptiness in students. They are not deficits; they are complex, substantial
human beings who arrive in class with diverse cultures; they have languages,
interests, feelings, experiences, and perceptions” (32), I thought of August.
It reminded me that you need to feel safe in your classrooms no matter who you
are. You’re no different from someone just because you’re not straight, or
because you’re not a man. You should always feel comfortable in your classroom
and included. That’s what will make us all great teachers.
I then proceeded to find a connection in addition to August
as well as Rodriguez and Collier. On pages 42 and 43, it said, “Auerbach and Wallerstein,
who adapted Freire's use of pictured scenes from daily life, called
"codes" or "codifications," to develop language skills, job
competencies, and critical thinking in English as a Second Language classes: The
goal of problem-posing dialogue is critical thinking and action, which starts
from perceiving the social, historical, or cultural causes of problems in one's
life... The first step in promoting action outside the classroom is to transform
education inside the classroom. Our role as teachers is to create a safe
environment in which students can express opinions and, most importantly, generate
their own language materials for learning and peer-teaching” (42-43). Not only
does this quote talk about ESL students, or students who speak English as a
second language, but it talks about how it’s our job to create a safe
environment for these students. It’s up to us to make them feel comfortable
when they come to school every day.
OKAY, last connection: I promise! I thought of Kahne and
Westheimer when I was reading this quote. It talks about how “very young
children can learn what health care is by discussing health care at home,
visiting the school nurse, and so forth. At this level, they can discuss justice
as meaning everyone gets treated by the nurse or by someone at home when
needed. In math, story problems can sensitize children to health care costs.
Children can then examine which jobs in the community provide health insurance
and which do not, and what kinds of people occupy which jobs. Older children
can find out what provisions there are in the community for health care for
poor people. Some of their own families may use such services” (46). Our major
theme this week was charity versus change. Within this quote, it shows you all
of these activities that you can do that are community service things and how to
go beyond “charity work”. I also think that this quote is important because it
shows you, as a future teacher, how you can make learning fun and educational
at the same time.
All in all, after painful hours of reading this week’s
article, it proved (yet again) to be useful information for us as teachers. It
tied in everything we have learned this semester and was a great way to tie
everything together. I’m very glad I was able to take this class and I’m kind
of upset this is our last blog post… ANYWAYS, Happy Easter again everybody!
XOXO
P.S. I found this article online that isn't completely wrong... It's "How to Be a Good Teacher" and it has 20 steps... Steps 2+4 remind me of Delpit, Step 3 reminds me of August, and other steps remind me of other articles... Do you guys see it too!? :D
Friday, April 4, 2014
Kliewer, "Citizenship in School: Reconceptualizing Down Syndrome"
Before I ever start this post, I just wanted to let everyone know that you should avoid libraries near schools. I'm in the library right now in Johnston and there are hundreds of little middle schools who WON'T STOP TALKING. I'm so mad right now. I thought libraries were meant to be quiet? Anyways, this is a "quotes" AND "connections" post, since I already did everything I'm making this a combined one :)
P.S. This is the first time I ever read something in one sitting (it was really interesting)
I think one quote that pretty much summed up a large chunk of this piece was: "diversity is viewed as normal, people are considered of equal worth, relationships are of a mutual benefit, and belongings is a central societal theme" (95). Well, it didn't really sum this article up but this is how disabilities should be viewed. As I was reading all of Kliewer's piece and every individual story, I felt that the theme going on was that you can't view a disability as a bad thing. You have to find the positives and focus on them instead of only looking about the disadvantages.
There was a story about a boy named John Mcgough. Before they even started off the story, they said that when a child has a disability, it's hard for people to recognize that child as a child. He used to live in one part of California where they didn't really accept him. He was left out of numerous activities, did not have any friends, and the school labeled him as "uneducable". WHO DOES THAT. As soon as John moved to a different area of California, everything changed (for the better). Everyone looked past his abnormalities and saw the real John. He was friends with all of his neighbors, everyone in his town, and he was finally accepted. That's all he wanted all along. During this part, there was a quote from one of his siblings that said, "Mendocino [the town John moved to] is what John needed-it's what he never had in North Hollywood. It's safe-what he calls a "safe space." Like a lot of people in Mendocino, he's accepted for what he is, not what he isn't. And he can concentrate on what he can do, instead of being shown or being told what he can't do" (86). This reminded me of August and "Safe Spaces" (not just because it literally says safe space). Once John moved, you could clearly see a change in his life. He wasn't isolated or left out for once. Once people didn't label him or look at him in a bad way, he was able to be accepted. He felt safe as soon as this happened. Although it took him a while, once he felt comfortable (and once people were comfortable with him), he was able to feel comfort in his every day life.
I also wanted to relate John Mcgough's story to another author that we have read. It's not the best connection, but this quote reminded me of someone: "By the end of John's first year in Mendocino he was holding down two part time jobs; taking weekly voice, art, and guitar lessons; attending aerobics classes five mornings a week; occasionally reading stories to kids at the local preschool; helping his mother teach a class on self-esteem to a group of troubled adolescents; making daily visiting"rounds" in the community; and going out to dance or listen to music at least five nights a week. He had numerous friends and acquaintances, and he was daily becoming more verbal and more assertive" (89). What does this remind you of?! QUICK, QUICK! Okay, I'll tell you. This reminded me of Herbert's article! Herbert mentioned how drastically where you live can affect your education. He wasn't necessarily talking about children with disability, but this (in a way) was very relevant! You can see that John was clearly not being treated fairly, or right, when he lived in North Hollywood. Once he got out of that bad area and moved to Mendocino, his life was improved in numerous ways. As you can see with the previous quote, his life drastically changed. From being the child that no one included in any activities, that was isolated and "uneducable", to this new person who had two jobs, was constantly out in his community and accepted. This was all because of his change in location. It's amazing.
Now that you guys have heard way too much about John, let's talk about Christine! Christine was in special educated classes for FOURTEEN YEARS. Her mom wanted to change that and put her in regular classes when she started high school. Christine struggled a lot at first, she had "extremely poor motor control, low-level cognitive skills, low-level communication skills, a lack of adaptive skills, and aggressive "acting-out" behaviors" (92). But this was a whole new thing for her, she has never been in a regular classroom. After going to school for a few weeks or months (they weren't very specific on that), she improved a lot! Her communication skills were better, her social skills, she was out in the community, and her fine and gross motor skills improved. This reminded me of the article I read by Jeannie Oakes. On page 178 in Oake's "Tracking" article, it says "since so much of importance was omitted from their curriculum, students in the low-ability classes were likely to have little contact with the knowledge and the skills that would allow them to move into higher classes or to be successful if they got there". This reminded me of Christine's situation because she was being deprived of the skills that higher classes had. That explains why she was struggling so much when she finally went into regular classes. Once she was able to understand what was going on, she was doing better and better! At one point, Christine even said "I have down syndrome, but I am not handicapped" (93).
I stumbled upon this article from the NBC News about how disabled workers were being paid PENNIES an hour... but it was legal!? My mind literally just got blown... again. I think you should really check this article out because it's awful. People with disabilities should be treated just the same as us. Just because they are handicapped in a certain area doesn't mean that they have any less value than we do.
P.S. This is the first time I ever read something in one sitting (it was really interesting)
I think one quote that pretty much summed up a large chunk of this piece was: "diversity is viewed as normal, people are considered of equal worth, relationships are of a mutual benefit, and belongings is a central societal theme" (95). Well, it didn't really sum this article up but this is how disabilities should be viewed. As I was reading all of Kliewer's piece and every individual story, I felt that the theme going on was that you can't view a disability as a bad thing. You have to find the positives and focus on them instead of only looking about the disadvantages.
There was a story about a boy named John Mcgough. Before they even started off the story, they said that when a child has a disability, it's hard for people to recognize that child as a child. He used to live in one part of California where they didn't really accept him. He was left out of numerous activities, did not have any friends, and the school labeled him as "uneducable". WHO DOES THAT. As soon as John moved to a different area of California, everything changed (for the better). Everyone looked past his abnormalities and saw the real John. He was friends with all of his neighbors, everyone in his town, and he was finally accepted. That's all he wanted all along. During this part, there was a quote from one of his siblings that said, "Mendocino [the town John moved to] is what John needed-it's what he never had in North Hollywood. It's safe-what he calls a "safe space." Like a lot of people in Mendocino, he's accepted for what he is, not what he isn't. And he can concentrate on what he can do, instead of being shown or being told what he can't do" (86). This reminded me of August and "Safe Spaces" (not just because it literally says safe space). Once John moved, you could clearly see a change in his life. He wasn't isolated or left out for once. Once people didn't label him or look at him in a bad way, he was able to be accepted. He felt safe as soon as this happened. Although it took him a while, once he felt comfortable (and once people were comfortable with him), he was able to feel comfort in his every day life.
I also wanted to relate John Mcgough's story to another author that we have read. It's not the best connection, but this quote reminded me of someone: "By the end of John's first year in Mendocino he was holding down two part time jobs; taking weekly voice, art, and guitar lessons; attending aerobics classes five mornings a week; occasionally reading stories to kids at the local preschool; helping his mother teach a class on self-esteem to a group of troubled adolescents; making daily visiting"rounds" in the community; and going out to dance or listen to music at least five nights a week. He had numerous friends and acquaintances, and he was daily becoming more verbal and more assertive" (89). What does this remind you of?! QUICK, QUICK! Okay, I'll tell you. This reminded me of Herbert's article! Herbert mentioned how drastically where you live can affect your education. He wasn't necessarily talking about children with disability, but this (in a way) was very relevant! You can see that John was clearly not being treated fairly, or right, when he lived in North Hollywood. Once he got out of that bad area and moved to Mendocino, his life was improved in numerous ways. As you can see with the previous quote, his life drastically changed. From being the child that no one included in any activities, that was isolated and "uneducable", to this new person who had two jobs, was constantly out in his community and accepted. This was all because of his change in location. It's amazing.
Now that you guys have heard way too much about John, let's talk about Christine! Christine was in special educated classes for FOURTEEN YEARS. Her mom wanted to change that and put her in regular classes when she started high school. Christine struggled a lot at first, she had "extremely poor motor control, low-level cognitive skills, low-level communication skills, a lack of adaptive skills, and aggressive "acting-out" behaviors" (92). But this was a whole new thing for her, she has never been in a regular classroom. After going to school for a few weeks or months (they weren't very specific on that), she improved a lot! Her communication skills were better, her social skills, she was out in the community, and her fine and gross motor skills improved. This reminded me of the article I read by Jeannie Oakes. On page 178 in Oake's "Tracking" article, it says "since so much of importance was omitted from their curriculum, students in the low-ability classes were likely to have little contact with the knowledge and the skills that would allow them to move into higher classes or to be successful if they got there". This reminded me of Christine's situation because she was being deprived of the skills that higher classes had. That explains why she was struggling so much when she finally went into regular classes. Once she was able to understand what was going on, she was doing better and better! At one point, Christine even said "I have down syndrome, but I am not handicapped" (93).
I stumbled upon this article from the NBC News about how disabled workers were being paid PENNIES an hour... but it was legal!? My mind literally just got blown... again. I think you should really check this article out because it's awful. People with disabilities should be treated just the same as us. Just because they are handicapped in a certain area doesn't mean that they have any less value than we do.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)