HAPPY EASTER EVERYONE!!! Who needs to go out when you can do
homework? (Haha, kidding, sort of…) Anyways, here’s another connections post
because… why not?
When I was reading Shor’s article, I was so unbelievably
bored! I don’t know why but I was. But then I was thinking, maybe because he
covers so many topics at once that I wasn’t really into the text. And maybe
because many of the things that he covered was related to the other articles
that we read.
On page 20, Shor said that “many withdraw from intellectual
work because they are told so much and asked to think and do so little. Rote
drills drain their enthusiasm for intellectual life, as do short-answer exams and
standardized tests”. This reminded me of that activity we did with Dr. Bogad
when we had that “pop quiz”… It was the week we had Jeannie Oake’s article. When
you go to school and do that, you’re not really learning anything… You’re
memorizing things just to pass but you’re not learning any helpful information.
On the next page, another quote backed up Oake’s theory even more. It said, “Large
numbers of students are refusing to perform at high levels, demoralizing the
teachers who work with them. At times, performance strikes become organized
resistance to authority, with leadership and articulate demands. But most often
the students’ refusal to perform appears as low motivation, low test scores and
achievement, and a “discipline problem”. […] The low performance of students is
routinely misjudged as low achievement”. This reminded me of the whole tracking
process and how some students had been put in the higher classes while others
were put in the lower ones. It kind of shows how kids refuse to do tracking in
schools. Then, when Dr. Bogad was explaining to us how ashamed she was that we
all just took this “stupid test” and didn’t refuse to take it even though they
were just basic questions, this quote came into play: “From the start, I wanted
students to be active and thoughtful. A participatory class begins with participation.
A critical and empowering class begins by examining its subject matter from the
students' point of view and by helping students see themselves acknowledgeable
people. I wanted them to take, from day one, a critical attitude toward their knowledge,
their writing habits, and their education. The foundation of the syllabus would
be their words, understandings, self-respect, and desire to learn more. I hoped
they would recognize that they were already writers who knew some important
things about writing, even before the teacher told them anything” (37). It
showed me that we aren’t dumb, we’re all very smart even though we may not see
it right away. We should never look at ourselves as anything less.
Then, my little buddy Kohn came into play with the ideal classroom. “The typical classroom
is framed by the competition, marked by struggle between students (and often
between teacher and students), and riddled by indicators of comparative
achievement and worth. Star charts on the wall announce who has been successful
at learning multiplication tables, only children with “neat” handwriting have
their papers posted for display” (23-24) reminded me of Kohn because it
reminded me of the “bad signs” of a classroom. It even mentioned two of them from
the chart itself, with only the “good” projects being shown to others and the
star chart. It’s a shame that this is considered a typical classroom.
Especially since we’ve learned all of the “good signs” a classroom should have,
this once again shows you how negative of an affect it can have on your
classroom.
When I came across the quote, “From a critical point of
view, existing canons of knowledge and usage are not a common culture; they
have ignored the multicultural themes, idioms, and achievements of nonelite
groups, such as women, minorities, homosexuals, and working people. The empowering
teacher who denies universal status to the dominant culture also denies
emptiness in students. They are not deficits; they are complex, substantial
human beings who arrive in class with diverse cultures; they have languages,
interests, feelings, experiences, and perceptions” (32), I thought of August.
It reminded me that you need to feel safe in your classrooms no matter who you
are. You’re no different from someone just because you’re not straight, or
because you’re not a man. You should always feel comfortable in your classroom
and included. That’s what will make us all great teachers.
I then proceeded to find a connection in addition to August
as well as Rodriguez and Collier. On pages 42 and 43, it said, “Auerbach and Wallerstein,
who adapted Freire's use of pictured scenes from daily life, called
"codes" or "codifications," to develop language skills, job
competencies, and critical thinking in English as a Second Language classes: The
goal of problem-posing dialogue is critical thinking and action, which starts
from perceiving the social, historical, or cultural causes of problems in one's
life... The first step in promoting action outside the classroom is to transform
education inside the classroom. Our role as teachers is to create a safe
environment in which students can express opinions and, most importantly, generate
their own language materials for learning and peer-teaching” (42-43). Not only
does this quote talk about ESL students, or students who speak English as a
second language, but it talks about how it’s our job to create a safe
environment for these students. It’s up to us to make them feel comfortable
when they come to school every day.
OKAY, last connection: I promise! I thought of Kahne and
Westheimer when I was reading this quote. It talks about how “very young
children can learn what health care is by discussing health care at home,
visiting the school nurse, and so forth. At this level, they can discuss justice
as meaning everyone gets treated by the nurse or by someone at home when
needed. In math, story problems can sensitize children to health care costs.
Children can then examine which jobs in the community provide health insurance
and which do not, and what kinds of people occupy which jobs. Older children
can find out what provisions there are in the community for health care for
poor people. Some of their own families may use such services” (46). Our major
theme this week was charity versus change. Within this quote, it shows you all
of these activities that you can do that are community service things and how to
go beyond “charity work”. I also think that this quote is important because it
shows you, as a future teacher, how you can make learning fun and educational
at the same time.
All in all, after painful hours of reading this week’s
article, it proved (yet again) to be useful information for us as teachers. It
tied in everything we have learned this semester and was a great way to tie
everything together. I’m very glad I was able to take this class and I’m kind
of upset this is our last blog post… ANYWAYS, Happy Easter again everybody!
XOXO
P.S. I found this article online that isn't completely wrong... It's "How to Be a Good Teacher" and it has 20 steps... Steps 2+4 remind me of Delpit, Step 3 reminds me of August, and other steps remind me of other articles... Do you guys see it too!? :D
Brandy, you really came out to play on this one didn't you! I loved reading this. You will be a great teacher. I am going to miss this class so much. Thank you for this post.
ReplyDeleteYour title killed me, I couldn't stop laughing. I really loved how you made so many connections to prove how this reading basically taught us everything we already knew and connected loose ends. I hard a hard time reading too,possibly due to too much easter candy. Fabulous job as always!
ReplyDelete